Skip to Main Content
Steps of a Systematic Review
Getting started
- Identify the team
- PI
- 2+ reviewers
- librarian (search strategy)
- statistician (meta-analysis)
- Define roles, responsibilities, expectations
- Develop a research question using a reliable question framework
- PICO
- SPIDER
- SPICE
- ECLIPSE
Conduct a preliminary literature search
- Are there existing SRs on the topic?
- What research exists?
- What are the gaps?
- Refine your question as needed
Develop a written protocol
- Team members
- Research Question, objectives and rationale for the study
- Databases and terms/keywords for searching
- Eligibility criteria
- Population (age, gender, health status, etc.)
- Study methodology (RCTs, Case Studies, etc.)
- Intervention of interest
- Outcomes of interest
- Setting (hospital, rural, etc.)
- Date range
- Language
- Define data elements for extraction
- Identify assessment process and tools
- Methods for data synthesis and reporting
- Register the protocol as appropriate
Conduct literature searches
- Consult/partner with a librarian
- Search multiple databases as appropriate
- Use results for further "hand" searching
- Find gray of unpublished literature
Collect/organize citations
- Select citation manager
- Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote
- De-duplicate citations
- Upload citations to screening tool as needed
- Covidence, Rayyan, Abstrackr, HAWC
Screen citations (two or more team members)
- Review titles & abstracts using protocol inclusions/exclusion criteria
- Locate full text and review second time using protocol inclusion/exclusion criteria
- Create PRISMA flow chart
Assess Quality
- Critically appraise each study in inclusive literature
- Extract data
- Create data tables that reflect results
Write the review
- Consult guidance documentation for writing/reporting standards
- Write the review
- Create supplementary materials