Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

University Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Systematic Reviews

Basic Steps in a Systematic Review

  • Plan the study
  • Identify contributors
  • Establish scope and search methodology
  • Identify body of literature for consideration
  • Evaluate studies for inclusion
  • Analyze (code) and combine results
  • Discuss
  • Summarize - provide a bottom line

Things to consider

Is it Feasible?

  • Is the question appropriate for a systematic review?
  • What is the scope of the review?
  • What related reviews are already published?
  • How many citations do you expect to find?

TREAD

Do have the necessary components?

  • TIME
  • RESOURCES
  • EXPERTISE
  • AUDIENCE
  • DATA

source: Both, Su'on and Papaioannou 2016

BioMed Central Stakeholder Involvement in Systematic Reviews
The active involvement of stakeholders is beneficial to the quality of a systematic review. Alex Pollock (Glasgow Caledonian University) and colleagues carried out a scoping review that considered 291 articles reporting stakeholder involvement. For most of the papers the quality of the reporting was poor and inconsistent, with only 10% judged to provide a comprehensive description of methods for involving stakeholders. A subset of 30 papers that showcased best practice were used to develop online learning resources.

Register your protocol

Planning Tools